DISAPPEARING STARS MISSING BLACK HOLES & RED TRANSIENTS

Another prediction that one would expect if in fact there are other frames of reference moving at incredibly fast relative speeds is that foreign objects not part of the original mass of our local Post would occasionally pass through our universe. Objects get ejected from orbits due to collisions or explosions or a nearby massive object pulls them out but moves away before the object can take orbit. Some of these objects will occasionally leave their local pocket of space time or could be left over rogues from some other big bang.

When these objects traverse our spacetime they would usually avoid making any contact because of the vast emptiness of space but to traverse from one end of our visible universe all the way to the other side without even making close contact to any single object would decrease the probability of zero contact even taking into consideration the vast emptiness between matter. There are probably not many of them and it may take a very long time to gauge how often they pass through but there is a good chance we already have evidence of these objects.

These rogue travelers can be of any possible size up but would have immense amounts of kinetic energy because their relative speeds would be so large. If a separate frame of reference has accelerated to .9 the speed of light relative to a much larger parent frame of reference and our frame is moving at .8 the speed of light relative inside our parent frames then the energy of those collisions could be enough to destroy a planet or star or even black hole.

We already know about a galaxy that is missing its black hole without an explanation for its disappearance and if it was struck by small moon making contract at relative speeds of 1.7 the speed of light it could pulverize a black hole or any star. Unless we capture the event depending on how far away it is we might just see a flicker or a bright star and as we continue to monitor the stars more and more closely and capture more and more data we will see this first hand someday.

There is a project underway called the VASCO project, short for the “Vanishing and Appearing Stuff during a Century of Observations”, Help Search The Skies and they are tracking the history of stellar recordings from decades apart to locate where objects are disappearing or appearing. They accept volunteers to use their online tools to help scour archives of images comparing them to try to locate items that have gone missing or have mysteriously appeared. Once the items are identified there are processes and algorithms that can determine if the object that is missing between two images taken years apart is expected to have moved or not. This work plus what we get form James Webb and other sources will continue to locate this mysterious items.

The other mysterious items are known as red transients. There have been instances where many , nearly 100 , bright objects appeared out of nowhere and were gone the next time that area was mapped. There are a handful of different theories for red transients but they are actually a prediction of successive collision theory. Because it predicts rouge objects traversing our space time moving at relative speeds exceeding the speed of light when they pass near or through nebula the energy of the friction could easily heat up and ignite nebula to burn like tiny suns for hours or days or maybe longer but without having had time for the nebula to condense in on itself all the separate fireballs would burn out.

Someday we may be able to locate a FTL (faster than light object) moving through our universe and be able to predict where it will make contact and when even though we won't be able to see the object. The trail left behind in theory could be traced to make a prediction that would require something moving faster than the speed of light in order to make contact with an object and then if accurate we would know where in the sky to record with all the different instruments we can point towards it. That would validate multiple things.

This would likely prove the successive collision theory as the cosmic event that created our VLS but it would mean the universe is almost definitely infinite in nature. We could in theory have one pocket of space time and our universe (the thing we think is so vast but is really nothing more than a cosmic speck of dust) , is all there is. But once we find proof of a faster than light object traversing through our solar system that originated from outside our known universe it would mean there is more than one pocket of space time and as soon as that happens then I feel the number must be infinite. If its greater than one , it can't be two, it can't be three, and it can't be some finite number. Its either one or infinite because a finite collection of pockets of relative space time would not take up an infinite amount of space and a non-infinite manifold of spacetime as far as I am concerned is not the natural state of nature.

#redtransients #disappearingstars #disappearingblackholes #FTL #superluminal #extinctionlevelevent#BIGBANG #thebigbang #successivecollisiontheory

#thenaturalstateofnature

LIVE LONG AND PROSPER
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU

SAY IT LOUD, SAY IT PROUD
THERE IS NO BOTTOM TURTLE.

All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.

42


DR JM NIPOK